Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699680›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

HIPrevision - a multicenter prospective randomized control superiority trial of antimicrobial IP-coated revision hip prostheses versus non-IP-coated comparators for the revision of periprosthetic hip joint infections.

Volker Alt, Nike Walter, Francisco Baixauli, Jerzy Bialecki, Lutz Dreyer, Jens Goronzy, Sebastian Hardt, Dirk Herold, Daniel Kendoff, Stefan Maenz and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06737809 (HIPrevision - A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Investigation of Antimicrobial IP-Coated Revision Hip Prostheses), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06737809 narecruitingnot on this map

HIPrevision - A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Investigation of Antimicrobial IP-Coated Revision Hip Prostheses

TypeinterventionalSponsorAesculap AGRan2025 to 2028Enrolled268ConditionsPeri-Prosthetic Joint InfectionArmsIP Plasmafit® Revision cup (and stem) system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Volker Alt *Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, 93053, Germany. volker.alt@ukr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0208-4650
Nike Walter *Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, 93053, Germany.
Francisco BaixauliServicio de Cirugia ortopédica y traumatologia, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Jerzy BialeckiGruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital CMKP, Otwock, Poland.
Lutz DreyerAesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Jens GoronzyUniversitätsCentrum für Orthopädie, Unfall- & Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sebastian HardtCentrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie (CMSC), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany.
Dirk HeroldKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Bad Mergentheim, Germany.
Daniel KendoffZentrum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan MaenzAesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Dominik RakOrthopädische Klinik König-Ludwig-Haus, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Maximilian RudertOrthopädische Klinik König-Ludwig-Haus, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Andrzej SionekGruca Orthopedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital CMKP, Otwock, Poland.
Maik Stiehler *UniversitätsCentrum für Orthopädie, Unfall- & Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sebastian Meller *Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Aesculap Akademie AAG-G-H-2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most severe complications in hip arthroplasty, and treatment of PJI is associated with high re-infection rates and significant loss of quality of life for patients, as well as socio-economic impact to health systems. Antimicrobial coating of implants with silver is a promising option to improve the outcome of PJI. However, there is no data from randomized control trials on silver-coated versus standard non-silver-coated implants in patients with PJI. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to assess clinical outcome for the use of silver-coated hip implants (further referred to as IP-coated) versus non-IP-coated implants in patients requiring surgical revision for hip PJI.

methodsThis is a multicenter confirmatory interventional randomized controlled superiority single-blinded study with two stages: pilot stage (part A) and pivotal stage (part B). Patients indicated for unilateral cementless acetabular and hip stem revision due to chronic periprosthetic infection planned for single-stage or two-stage surgical procedures are included. Patients will randomly be assigned either to the IP-coated or the non-IP-coated implant group. The primary outcome parameter is infection-free survival within 12 months after hip PJI. The underlying hypothesis is that the IP coating significantly reduces the risk of periprosthetic reinfection compared to the non-IP-coated implants. Secondary outcome parameters include data on the safety and performance of the prostheses through a 2-year clinical follow-up, including patient-related outcome parameters, such as Harris Hip Score, EQ-5D, radiographical assessment, and blood silver concentrations. An adaptive study design is planned with the inclusion of 268 subjects according to initial sample size calculations. Upon follow-up of 134 patients for 12 months or inclusion of 90% of the study patients, preliminary study results will be used to re-estimate the sample size, which may be extended up to 400 subjects. DISCUSSION: The current study aims to fill the evidence gap for the idea of IP-coated implants to reduce re-infection rates in the treatment of hip PJI. To the authors' best knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled superiority trial evaluating the outcome of a silver-coated versus a non-silver-coated prosthesis for the treatment of hip PJI. The adaptive study design allows an adjustment of the initial sample size to reduce the risk of an underpowered superiority.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06737809 (date of publication 17.12.2024).

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipCoated Materials, BiocompatibleHip ProsthesisProsthesis-Related InfectionsSilverEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReoperationSingle-Blind MethodTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCoated Materials, BiocompatibleSilverCoatingHipHip revision arthroplastyPeriprosthetic joint infectionPJIRe-revisionSilver

Identifiers

PMID41699680
PMCPMC12930628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.