Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699652›Full record

ArticleMobile DNA2026

Boundary-associated propagation of a processed pseudogene dissects pre-existing limitations of genome annotation in the T2T era.

Min-Gyu Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mobile DNA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Min-Gyu LeeSchool of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Anam-dong, Sungbuk-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. leemg@korea.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProcessed pseudogenes and retrogenes are defined by their RNA-mediated origin and, by virtue of this origin-based definition, are often interpreted as discrete genomic insertions. The completion of telomere-to-telomere (T2T) reference assemblies has substantially improved the resolution of segmental duplication architectures and centromeric satellite sequences that were previously inaccessible, allowing genomic structural contexts that were effectively invisible in earlier references to be directly examined.

resultsUsing the SEPTIN14P-CICP locus family as a case study, chain-based comparative analyses showed that a genomic window spanning the SEPTIN14 3′ terminal exon and the adjacent processed pseudogene CICP12 is dispersed into multiple segmental duplication-associated units across great apes, rather than being maintained as a single orthologous locus. Genome-wide analyses further indicated that annotated CICP loci preferentially localize within segmental duplication blocks and accumulate near pericentromeric or subtelomeric regions. Despite this duplication-associated dispersion, codon-based selection analyses revealed pervasive purifying selection acting on the full-length SEPTIN14 coding sequence and its 3′ terminal exon, arguing against a model in which the terminal exon was newly formed through segmental duplication. Together, these results show that when highly conserved, strongly constrained coding regions are embedded within segmental duplication-rich regions, co-dispersed processed pseudogene copies can be interpreted as distinct from independently generated LINE-1-mediated insertions and as reflecting secondary structural propagation.

conclusionsWhen considered in light of origin-based definitions of processed pseudogenes and retrogenes, and specifically within duplication-rich and structurally unstable genomic regions resolved by T2T-level assemblies, these results suggest that multiple annotated loci can arise through secondary propagation of a single RNA-derived insertion. Under such contexts, incorporation of selective constraint and cross-species conservation enables more reliable distinction between source insertions and their secondarily propagated copies. This case study highlights a limitation of current annotation frameworks and demonstrates the need for more precise annotation that incorporates evolutionary and structural context in the T2T era.

Indexed as

Annotation errorCentromeric duplicationChromosomal boundaryProcessed pseudogeneRetrogeneRetrotranspositionSegmental duplicationSEPTIN14T2T annotationT2T unique

Identifiers

PMID41699652
PMCPMC13015009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.