ArticleBMC medical education2026
Effect of centring rings and an educational intervention on intraoral radiographic quality among dental students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntraoral radiography is a core diagnostic skill in dental practice. However, technical errors, such as cone cuts and positioning inaccuracies, remain common among undergraduate dental students, leading to image retakes and unnecessary radiation exposure. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of centering rings combined with a structured educational package on intraoral radiographic quality, technical errors, and student confidence.
methodsA quasi-experimental pre–post study was conducted among 109 dental students and interns at the College of Dentistry, University of Ha’il, Saudi Arabia. Baseline assessments included radiographic performance, technical errors, retakes, image quality, and self-reported confidence. Participants then received a standardized educational intervention on intraoral radiography and centering ring use. Post-training assessments were performed using identical evaluation criteria. Pre- and post-intervention outcomes were compared using appropriate paired statistical tests, and correlation analyses were performed to examine associations between confidence, image quality, and retake frequency. Chi-square, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and Spearman’s correlation were used to assess group differences, training effects, and associations, with p < 0.05 considered significant.
resultsAmong 109 dental students (52.3% female), baseline cone cuts were observed in 15.6% of periapical and 26.6% of bitewing radiographs. Following the intervention, cone cuts decreased significantly (periapical: Z = − 3.300, p = 0.001; bitewing: Z = − 2.629, p = 0.009), with a marked improvement in image quality (periapical: Z = − 2.753, p = 0.006; bitewing: Z = − 5.506, p < 0.001). Retake frequency decreased and self-reported confidence increased significantly (Z = − 7.446, p < 0.001). Gains were observed across all academic levels, particularly for technique-sensitive bitewing imaging. Higher post-training image quality was associated with fewer retakes (r = − 0.278, p = 0.003), indicating improved technical proficiency and radiation safety.
conclusionObserved improvements in image quality, reduced cone cuts, fewer retakes, and increased student confidence were noted following the introduction of centering rings and a focused educational intervention. These findings suggest a positive association between the intervention and radiographic performance in undergraduate training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.