ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Machine learning for dysphagia risk prediction in older adults after acute ischemic stroke.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment of a machine learning prediction model for Wallerian degeneration after ischemic stroke.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Application of intelligent technologies for dysphagia risk prediction: A scoping review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-stroke dysphagia (PSD) is prevalent in older adults after acute ischemic stroke (AIS), increasing risks like pneumonia and malnutrition. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models for early PSD prediction.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we utilized electronic health records from a cohort of 908 AIS patients (≥ 60 years), partitioned into training and internal test sets at a 7:3 ratio. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and the Boruta algorithm were used to identify key PSD predictors. Eight ML algorithms were trained, and model performance was assessed using metrics such as the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity, recall, F1 score, Brier score, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was employed for model interpretation.
resultsThe incidence of PSD was 51.1% (464/908) in this cohort. Random Forest (RF) emerged as the optimal model, achieving the highest AUC of 0.873 in the testing set, slightly superior to the gradient boosting machine (0.869) and the neural network (0.867). It also exhibited competitive performance across various metrics, including accuracy (0.783), specificity (0.737), recall (0.830), F1 score (0.792), and Brier score (0.148). SHAP analysis identified hypertension, the Barthel Index, and dysarthria as the top three significant predictors of PSD among stroke patients.
conclusionThese findings suggest that ML algorithms, especially RF, can accurately predict PSD, allowing for early targeted interventions. Integrating ML tools into stroke care pathways could reduce dysphagia-related complications and improve resource utilization. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results across diverse populations. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.