ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2026
A practical non-custom abdominal corset-based approach for diaphragm motion management in stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), abdominal compression devices are commonly used to manage respiratory motion. The high cost, bulky design, and low patient tolerance of these devices limit utilization. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of non-custom lumbosacral corsets on respiratory motion and clinical outcomes in SBRT delivered for a heterogeneous cohort of lower thoracic and upper abdominal lesions.
methodsA total of 46 patients underwent two separate slow-CT scans with 1 mm slice thickness, with and without the corset. A “traditional lumbosacral corset with an extensile bands” was used. The diaphragm motion was evaluated with diaphragm amplitude, Δamplitude, liver and spleen artifact volumes, and their changes (Δvolume). All patients were treated with the corset during all SBRT fractions. Clinical outcomes were assessed in patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. Statistical analyses were performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and paired t-tests, Spearman’s correlation, and both univariate and multivariate linear regression. Paired comparisons and regression analyses were performed to assess motion reduction and its association with patient factors.
resultsThe median age was 67 years (45–82), with 17 female and 29 male patients. The corset decreased the diaphragm amplitude from 1.13 cm (0.20–3.01) to 0.55 cm (0.17–1.93) (p < 0.001). Initial diaphragm amplitude ≥ 1 cm decreased − 0.84 cm; <0.5 cm decreased − 0.13 cm (p < 0.001). Following corset application, the proportion of patients with diaphragm amplitude ≤ 1 cm increased from 39.1% (n = 18) to 82.6% (n = 38), approximately doubling, while those with amplitude ≤ 0.5 cm increased from 13.0% (n = 6) to 47.8% (n = 22), representing nearly a fourfold increase. Both univariate and multivariate analyses found no significant effect of gender, age, or body mass index on Δamplitude and Δvolume values with the corset (p > 0.05). At 6 months, 73.9% of patients showed complete response. Local progression occurred in 5 (%10.9) patients. One- and two-year local control rates were 89.0% and 65.0%.
conclusionNon-custom lumbosacral corsets effectively reduced diaphragm motion, particularly in patients with baseline amplitudes > 1 cm. This low-cost, and well-tolerated approach offers a reliable alternative for motion management during SBRT in radiotherapy centers lacking dedicated motion management equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.