Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699591›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2026

Evaluating the effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation-based training on clinical skill transfer in obstetric ultrasound residents: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Jinguang Zhou, Yongfeng Zhao, Ping Zhou, Xiaohong Tang, Wengang Liu, Shiyan Guo, Jie Wang, Linlu Li

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jinguang ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yongfeng ZhaoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China. redscv@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0777-1890
Ping ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiaohong TangClinical skill center, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Wengang LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Shiyan GuoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jie WangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Linlu LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.

Funding

Project of the 14th five year plan of Educational Science in Hunan Province XJK21AGD002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional training in obstetric ultrasound is constrained by patient availability and ethical concerns. In contrast, simulation-based medical education offers a safe, repeatable, and realistic alternative by replicating clinical environments for hands-on practice. This study aims to evaluate the clinical transferability of skills acquired through simulation and compare its effectiveness with traditional training in improving residents’ ultrasound competencies.

methodsThis prospective randomized controlled study included 22 PGY-2 or PGY-3 residents recruited between 2020 and 2021. Participants were randomly assigned to either the simulator (n = 11) or traditional (n = 11) group. All participants underwent short-term mid-trimester fetal ultrasound training program consisting of 2 h of theoretical instruction and 5 h of hands-on skills training, using either a simulator or pregnant volunteers. Participants were required to complete mid-trimester ultrasound assessments on both the simulator and pregnant volunteers before and after training. Assessment scores were evaluated by ultrasound consultants using the validated Objective Ultrasound Competency Assessment Tool.

resultsAfter training, both groups showed significant improvement in post-test scores (p < 0.05). Trainees in the simulator group not only demonstrated enhanced assessment scores in the simulated environment (57.7 ± 11.0vs81.0 ± 5.6, p < 0.01) but also exhibited notable improvements in their skills in the real clinical setting (53.5 ± 8.8vs74.1 ± 12.0, p < 0.01). A comparison of the assessment scores between the two groups revealed that the type of training had a significant impact on the residents’ performance improvement, with simulator-based training proving to be more effective than traditional training (p < 0.05) and showing a large effect size (Partial η²>0.14). Pearson correlation analysis indicated a strong positive correlation between the scores of assessment on simulator and the scores of assessment on pregnant volunteers (r > 0.7).

conclusionsSimulation-Based Medical Education enhances residents’ performance in both simulated environments and real clinical settings and is more effective than traditional clinical training methods. Additionally, simulation can serve as a powerful complement to traditional training and a safe alternative to patient-based assessment methods involving pregnant women.

trial registrationThis trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with registration number ChiCTR2500107408 on August 11, 2025 (Retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceHigh Fidelity Simulation TrainingInternship and ResidencyObstetricsUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesObstetricSimulationSimulation based medical educationUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID41699591
PMCPMC13014738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.