ArticleBMC public health2026
Exploring the role of mass media and virtual social networks on couples' childbearing decisions: an exploratory qualitative study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrevious studies have addressed the role of mass media in shaping couples’ fertility attitudes and behaviors. This qualitative study aimed to explain the role of mass media and virtual social networks on couples’ childbearing decisions.
methodsIn this exploratory qualitative study, in-depth interviews were conducted with 34 participants, including couples, key informants, and experts in the fields of population and childbearing, who were purposefully selected. Data were collected through semi-structured face-to-face interviews, continuing until data saturation was achieved. Data analysis was performed using MAXQDA software, employing a conventional content analysis approach that involved the provision of analytical codes and the identification of categories.
findingsFrom the data analysis, four main categories emerged: intentional promotion of reproductive behaviors, indirect dissemination of low-fertility-oriented values and transnational cultures, empowering mothers, and completing family leisure and entertainment opportunities. Mass media directly or indirectly influences couples’ reproductive behaviors and may have short-term and long-term effects on their childbearing decisions.
conclusionMass media in the social and cultural context of Iran can influence couples’ fertility decisions. Managing reproductive behaviors in families and society requires attention to couples’ exposure to mass media and virtual networks and the mechanisms of their impact on childbearing. Policymakers in Iran need to pay attention to the role of the media in designing interventions that affect couples’ reproductive behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.