SynthesisBMC urology2026
Evaluation of animal models for urethral stricture: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMale urethral strictures are relatively common but can be challenging to treat. Varying urethroplasty surgery techniques and the use of different grafts show mixed outcomes. Many animal models have been used to study urethral stricture disease. The aim of this article is to review current animal models for urethral strictures as described in the contemporary literature. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search included all original and review articles published in English over the past three decades, up to January 2025. Keywords used were: “urethral stricture,” “animal model,” “urethral disease,” “preclinical studies,” “rat,” “mice,” “rabbit,” “pig,” “swine” and their combinations.
resultsRat, rabbit, and pig animal models have been widely used for the creation of urethral strictures. Methods to create urethral strictures in rodents include mostly the use of TGF-β1 and electrocoagulation. Several additional methods have been used in rabbits, including endoscopic resection, radiofrequency coagulation, holmium laser and injection of bleomycin. In the porcine model, electro- and thermocoagulation have been used. Each method used for the creation of urethral strictures has its own set of advantages and limitations.
conclusionSince the human penis has a unique anatomy, no animal model can fully simulate clinical urethral stricture disease. However, despite each model’s limitations, sufficient options are available to address most clinical research questions. Model selection should depend on the specific research goals and anatomical or technical requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.