ArticleBMC public health2026
Perceptions and treatment seeking for abnormal uterine bleeding among women of reproductive age group in rural North India: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), affecting 3–30% of women of reproductive age, can lead to serious physical complications such as anaemia and infertility, and also negatively impacts mental well-being, social participation, and economic productivity. Despite this, treatment-seeking remains low due to poor health literacy, cultural taboos, limited autonomy in decision-making, and inadequate access to female healthcare providers.
methodsThe qualitative study was conducted between September—November 2022 in Sahupura Village, under Primary Health Centre (PHC) Dayalpur, Faridabad, Haryana, using in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focused group discussions (FGDs) with various stakeholders, including WRA, accredited social health activists (ASHA), multipurpose health workers (MPW), and gynaecologists. Nine IDIs and four FGDs were conducted including a total of 38 participants. Thematic analysis was done to analyse both IDIs and FGDs.
resultsFour key domains were identified: perceptions about AUB, treatment-seeking behaviour, perceived impact, and barriers to seeking treatment. According to WRA, AUB was characterized by changes in the frequency, duration, amount, and quality of menstrual bleeding. Women of reproductive age (WRA) had varied perceptions of AUB, often influenced by cultural beliefs and misinformation. Treatment-seeking behaviour was commonly delayed due to normalization of symptoms, lack of awareness, and social stigma. The perceived impact of AUB extended beyond physical health, affecting mental and social well-being, with implications for daily functioning. Barriers hindering seeking treatment included limited availability of female doctors, long queues in hospitals, high travel costs, lack of support from family, and a fear of potential side effects of drugs.
conclusionsThe study highlights that women’s treatment-seeking for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is dependent not only on their understanding of the condition but also on sociocultural stigma, limited autonomy, and the preference for female healthcare providers. Addressing these individual and systemic barriers is essential to improving access to timely and appropriate care for AUB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.