ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Correlations between surface area and volume in cell size and growth in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analyzing morphological parameters and growth at the cell level is crucial for a better understanding of organ development. The most popular approach for quantitative analyses of development relies on confocal imaging of an organ expressing a fluorescent membrane marker over several time points, and analyzing the confocal dataset to quantify changes in morphological parameters and growth rate. These analyses are commonly done on the surface, with the assumption that changes in the surface of a cell reflect faithfully changes of the whole, volumetric cell. However, this assumption has not yet been systematically and explicitly tested. It is also not clear how the correlation between areal and volumetric measurements would change over time. Here, we combined time-series live imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction to compare surface and volumetric size and growth of cotyledon and sepal epidermal cells in Arabidopsis thaliana. We found that on average, surface area is tightly correlated with volume in both cell size and growth, supporting the use of surface area as a good proxy for volume at the population level. However, cells with similar surface areas or surface growth can display substantial differences in volume and volumetric growth. This happens due to variation in cell thickness, which in turn is controlled by microtubules. These findings highlight limitations of surface-based metrics, and call for volumetric analyses if a more accurate assessment of cell parameters is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.