ArticleBMC primary care2026
Implementing systematic depression screening in primary care: lessons from the MDD Minds global quality improvement pilot.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression remains underdiagnosed in primary care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite advocacy for mental health integration into primary care, evidence on practical implementation strategies in diverse international settings is limited. This study evaluated the feasibility of implementing practice-driven systematic depression screening among adult patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) across primary care practices in four countries.
methodsThe Major Depressive Disorder Management in Primary Care (MDD Minds) initiative implemented a 12-week quality improvement pilot across nine primary care practices in Brazil, Japan, Kenya, and Nigeria. Practices received local coaching, educational resources, and adaptable workflow tools to screen adult patients with DM for depression during routine care visits. Data on screening rates, depression identification, and resource provision were collected using standardized forms.
resultsAmong 1,592 adult patients with diabetes seen during the 12-week implementation period, 582 (36.6%) were newly screened for depression. Practices without baseline depression documentation identified depression in 54.9% of screened patients, compared to 12.2% in practices with existing documentation, demonstrating substantial under-detection in settings without systematic screening. Of those screened, 105 (18.0%) had positive screens indicating depressive symptoms. An additional 211 patients (13.3%) had prior documented depression diagnoses. In total, 326 patients (19.6%) were diagnosed with depressive symptoms.
conclusionsThis multi-country implementation study demonstrates that systematic depression screening integrated into routine diabetes care is feasible across diverse primary care settings when supported by adaptable workflows and structured coaching. Findings highlight the importance of local ownership and context-specific implementation strategies for integrating mental health screening into chronic disease management in global primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.