ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Short-term nitrogen addition mediates nutrient allocation and resorption trade-offs in Populus koreana: insights for vegetation restoration on volcanic lava platform.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEcological stoichiometry serves as a foundational framework for understanding plant nutrient acquisition, allocation, and conservation strategies in extreme environments. The Wudalianchi volcanic lava platform represents a naturally oligotrophic habitat where Populus koreana functions as a keystone pioneer species during early ecological succession. However, the physiological and stoichiometric responses of P. koreana to nitrogen (N) enrichment remain poorly understood. This knowledge gap constrains both theoretical development of ecological stoichiometry in geologically extreme systems and the formulation of evidence-based ecological restoration strategies for volcanic substrates. To address this, we conducted a controlled short-term N addition experiment across 12 randomized plots (10 m × 10 m each), applying four N treatments: 0 (control), 4, 8, and 16 g N·m⁻²·yr⁻¹.
resultsN addition increased soil total organic carbon (TOC) (23.04–142.68%) and total N (TN) (2.94–95.59%), reduced total phosphorus (TP) (7.55–15.09%) and available N: P ratio. N and P concentrations in mature leaves increased significantly (by 28.76–49.87% and 11.13–24.75%, respectively), whereas P concentrations decreased in fine branches and fine roots. Senescent leaf N and P concentrations rose by 6.57–17.60% and 14.10–38.06%, respectively, with a greater increase in P leading to a lower senescent leaf N: P ratio. N resorption efficiency (NRE) increased significantly (by 23.34–33.26%), while P resorption efficiency (PRE) decreased (by 5.67–11.43%). Mature leaf N and P concentrations were positively correlated with soil TN and available P (AP), respectively. In contrast, P concentrations and N: P ratios in fine branches and fine roots correlated negatively with soil AP and the available N: AP ratio, but positively with soil TP and the TN: TP ratio. NRE correlated positively with leaf N concentration, while PRE correlated negatively with both mature leaves P concentration and soil AP.
conclusionShort-term N addition reshapes soil nutrient availability, driving P. koreana to adopt a “photosynthetic organ-prioritized” nutrient allocation strategy and an N–P resorption trade-off. While N addition partially alleviates N limitation, it concurrently exacerbates P demand, thereby accelerating the transition from N limitation toward N–P co-limitation. These findings refine ecological stoichiometric theory in nutrient-impoverished volcanic ecosystems and offer mechanistically grounded, quantitative guidance for targeted vegetation restoration on lava platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.