ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
Semi-automatic geometrical reconstruction and analysis of filopodia dynamics in 4D two-photon microscopy images.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Semi-automatic geometrical reconstruction and analysis of filopodia dynamics in 4D two photon microscopy images.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFilopodia are thin and dynamic membrane protrusions that play a crucial role in cell migration, axon guidance, and other processes where cells explore and interact with their surroundings. Historically, filopodial dynamics have been studied in great detail in 2D in cultured cells, and more recently in 3D culture as well as living brains. However, there is a lack of efficient tools to trace and track filopodia in 4D images of complex brain cells.
resultsTo address this issue, we have developed a semi-automatic workflow for tracing filopodia in 3D images and tracking the traced filopodia over time. The workflow was developed based on high-resolution data of photoreceptor axon terminals in the in vivo context of normal Drosophila brain development, but devised to be applicable to filopodia in any system, including at different temporal and spatial scales. In contrast to the pre-existing methods, our workflow relies solely on the original intensity images without the requirement for segmentation or complex preprocessing. The workflow was realized in C++ within the Amira software system and consists of two main parts, dataset pre-processing, and geometrical filopodia reconstruction, where each of the two parts comprises multiple steps. In this paper, we provide an extensive workflow description and demonstrate its versatility for two different axo-dendritic morphologies, R7 and Dm8 cells. Finally, we provide an analysis of the time requirements for user input and data processing.
conclusionTo facilitate simple application within Amira or other frameworks, we share the source code, which is available at https://github.com/zibamira/filopodia-tool .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.