Microbiome-mediated colonization resistance to and countermeasures of Klebsiella pneumoniae.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Enhanced invasiveness promotes the dominance of a widely-distributed carbapenem-resistant virulence-plasmid-carrying Klebsiella pneumoniae sublineage.Nature communications · 2026
   Article
2. Intestinal mucus acts as a nutrient source and signal forMicrobiome research reports · 2026
   Article
3. Gut microbiota dysbiosis and the gut-lung axis in COPD: mechanisms, clinical relevance, and microbiota-targeted interventions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.