Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699394›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A multi-authority attribute ring signature supporting dynamic policies and dual anonymity for zero-trust networks.

Jinhong Chen, Xueguang Zhou, Wei Fu, Yihuan Mao, Jiaqi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jinhong ChenNaval University of Engineering, Wuhan, 430033, China.
Xueguang ZhouNaval University of Engineering, Wuhan, 430033, China.
Wei FuNaval University of Engineering, Wuhan, 430033, China. weifu@nue.edu.cn.
Yihuan MaoNaval University of Engineering, Wuhan, 430033, China.
Jiaqi WangJiujiang Shuangfeng Primary School, Jiujiang, 332000, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62276273Science and Technology Research Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education GJJ2405006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of Decentralized Identity (DID) technology is fundamentally changing the way digital identity is managed, allowing user-controlled, privacy-preserving authentication across trust domains a fundamental requirement if zero trust architectures are to be realized, in which continuous verification and least-privilege access are inherent properties. Under traditional ABS (attribute-based signature) schemes, these are difficult to achieve as fine-grained access control is not always possible in practice and anonymity may not be straightforward when policy is evolving dynamically and different authorities may be involved. In this paper, we present a new multi-authority attribute ring signature scheme, which leverages DID philosophy and anonymous credential techniques, enabling users to mix attributes dynamically according to the policies of veriers without disclosing their pseudonyms or partial attributes. The proposed scheme enables distributed key generation by multiple authorities and is shown to be secure in the random oracle model, achieving existential unforgeability against adaptive chosen-message, identity, and attribute attacks (EUF-CMIAA) as well as full signer and attribute anonymity. Based on the SM9 cryptographic standard, our approach reduces the number of [Formula: see text] exponentiations and scalar multiplications during signing by approximately 30% compared to existing ring signatures, offering a practical and efficient authentication solution for emerging DID-driven zero-trust networks.

Indexed as

Anonymous signatureAttribute-based signatureDecentralized identityMulti-authorityZero trust

Identifiers

PMID41699394
PMCPMC13004895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.