ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2026
Bridging technical innovation and computational advances in studies of RNA-protein assemblies.
Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA-dependent protein assemblies - including the spliceosome, ribosome and RNA-dependent membraneless organelles - have crucial roles in diverse cellular processes through RNA scaffolding and hierarchical assembly. Various empirical techniques and artificial intelligence algorithms have been developed to help understand the architecture, dynamics and functional implications of RNA-protein complexes, and their further development is underway to comprehensively integrate this information. This Review explores how combining these diverse technologies will enhance our understanding of the biological functions of RNA-dependent protein assemblies. We first explore methodological frontiers, contrasting traditional approaches with new platforms, which enable the identification and tracking of RNA-protein assembly dynamics on the same RNA molecules. We then present avenues for integrating these new experimental techniques with machine-learning methods to improve both predictive models of RNA-protein assembly and functional RNA design. We discuss how the synergy between experimental and digital biology can drive new insights into disease mechanisms and therapeutic strategies, including targeted modulation of pathogenic RNA-protein assemblies. Finally, we examine roadmaps for future research, emphasizing the potential of closed-loop systems that iteratively refine our understanding of RNA-protein assemblies through cycles of hypothesis generation, prediction, experimentation and validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.