ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Potential for vertical control using direct 3D‑printed mandibular advancement clear aligners.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the biomechanical performance of the direct 3D‑printed monoblock mandibular advancement clear aligner (MACA) designs intended for different vertical control objectives via finite element analysis (FEA). MATERIALS AND
methodsAn FEA model was constructed from CBCT and intraoral scans of a 12-year-old Class II patient. To isolate design-dependent effects, three monoblock MACA designs for different vertical control objectives were tested on this single, morphology‑controlled skeletal model. Passive tension from six craniofacial muscles was simulated during occlusal reconstruction. Appliance deformation, mandibular displacement, and tooth movement were analyzed.
resultsAll three MACAs demonstrated satisfactory manufacturability and maintained stable mandibular advancement under muscular tension. Low-angle MACA intruded lower incisors while creating posterior interocclusal space that may be permissive for subsequent vertical adaptation under clinical conditions, aligning with treatment objectives for low‑angle cases. Lower incisor labial inclination was observed, which could be mitigated by localized appliance thickening. Average-angle MACA intruded anterior teeth while maintaining posterior height and mandibular plane angle. High-angle MACA induced molar intrusion. When combined with targeted anterior intrusion, this dual mechanism provided precise vertical control and may be associated with counterclockwise mandibular rotation.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the design capability of direct 3D‑printed MACAs and proposes preliminary design principles for customized MACAs addressing different vertical treatment objectives. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provided preliminary design principles for customized MACAs. Pattern-specific MACA designs may inform treatment strategies, but clinical validation through studies incorporating true anatomical variation across different vertical skeletal patterns is essential before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41699329What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.