ArticleArchives of toxicology2026
Rat and human primary proximal tubule epithelial cells allow for cross-species comparisons of drug-induced nephrotoxicity in vitro.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Translating nephrotoxicity risks from rat to human is hampered by species differences in kidney physiology. An in vitro rat kidney platform focused on proximal tubules, the primary site of drug-induced injury, could enable mechanistic, cross-species assessments. Here, we characterized rat primary proximal tubule epithelial cells (rPPTEC) and evaluated their use for nephrotoxicity studies in vitro. rPPTEC were characterized by gene and protein expression, and drug transporter functionality. Next, rPPTEC were exposed to 7 validation compounds (4 nephrotoxicants, 3 non-nephrotoxicants), after which cell viability was assessed with ATP and LDH assays, and high-content imaging. Finally, the toxicity response to compounds known to be more toxic in rat than in human (rat-enhanced nephrotoxicants) was compared in rPPTEC and human renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (HRPTEC). rPPTEC expressed proximal tubule markers (Aqp1, Ggt1), and functionally active drug transporters (P-gp, Oct2, Lrp2/Cubn), but lacked Oat1. The nephrotoxicants cisplatin, puromycin and cyclosporin A, but not tenofovir, induced dose-dependent decreases in ATP, increases in LDH, and alterations in imaging-based parameters. None of the non-nephrotoxicants were associated with major alterations in cell viability nor high-content imaging parameters. rPPTEC were more sensitive to the rat-enhanced nephrotoxicants zoledronate and ibandronic acid, but also to cisplatin and cyclosporin A. Notably, 45% of rPPTEC stained positive for Ki-67, compared to 0.7% of HRPTEC. rPPTEC exhibited a proximal tubular phenotype and correctly identified 6 out of 7 validation compounds. Parallel exposures in rPPTEC and HRPTEC revealed greater sensitivity of rPPTEC towards nephrotoxicants, potentially explained by the greater proliferative capacity of rPPTEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.