Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699284›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026

Optimal timing of microsurgical resection after preoperative embolization of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 1,469 patients.

Beste Gülsuna, Belda Gülsuyu, Timurhan Aksoy, Ethan Wood, Burak Özaydin, Ethan A Winkler, Christopher S Graffeo

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Beste GülsunaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Belda GülsuyuDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Timurhan AksoyFaculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Ethan WoodCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Burak ÖzaydinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Ethan A WinklerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Christopher S GraffeoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA. Graffeo@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preoperative embolization is frequently employed to facilitate microsurgical resection of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), but optimal surgical timing remains debated. This study evaluated whether hybrid versus staged approaches influence surgical morbidity, resection completeness, and postembolization complications to inform standardized management. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and OVID/Medline through February 2025 identified studies reporting outcomes after preoperative embolization followed by microsurgical AVM resection. Studies were stratified by timing: hybrid, < 48 h, and < 1 week. Primary outcome was postembolization complications; secondary outcomes included favorable functional status, complete AVM resection, and mortality. Random-effects meta-analysis with I² statistics assessed heterogeneity. Twenty-eight studies including 1,469 patients were analyzed. Resection within 48 h of embolization was associated with fewer postembolization complications (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.98, p = 0.019) and higher rates of complete resection (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03–1.28, p = 0.014) compared with delayed surgery (> 48 h). Hybrid procedures similarly demonstrated lower complication risk (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.60–1.17, p = 0.39) and significantly improved resection completeness (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.10–1.33, p < 0.001) relative to staged approaches. No significant differences were observed in favorable functional outcomes or mortality among timing groups. Timing of microsurgical resection after preoperative embolization impacts complication rates and completeness of AVM removal. Surgery within 48 h or using a hybrid approach may optimize these outcomes, although functional recovery and mortality appear unaffected.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticIntracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsMicrosurgeryNeurosurgical ProceduresHumansPreoperative CareTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeArteriovenous malformationEmbolizationEndovascular treatmentMicrosurgeryObliterationOptimal timing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.