ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
PET/CT-based quantification of intratumoral heterogeneity for predicting pathological complete response in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A multicentre study.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a quantitative measure of intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) from pretreatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) images and to evaluate its potential for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer (BC). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included patients with BC who underwent NAC at four hospitals between 2013 and 2025. Tumour regions on pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT images were clustered to extract intratumoral ecological diversity features, while radiomic features were extracted from the entire tumour. Output probabilities from imaging-based extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were used to generate an ITH index and a radiomics score, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with pCR. Significant variables, including clinicopathologic characteristics, radiomics score, and ITH index, were integrated into a combined predictive model (ICR-COME). Model performance and clinical utility were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses (DCA). Survival differences between predicted pCR and non-pCR groups were assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis. RNA sequencing data from 12 patients were analysed to further explore the biological basis of ICR-COME.
resultsThe study included 323 women (median age, 51 years ± 10[SD]). For predicting pCR in BC patients, ICR-COME achieved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.95 in the training cohort and 0.87 and 0.88 in external test cohorts B and C, respectively, which were significantly superior to those of the clinicopath model and the conventional radiomics model using 18F-FDG PET/CT (all P < 0.05, DeLong test). Calibration curve and DCA indicated that ICR-COME achieved satisfactory concordance and provided the greatest clinical net benefit. Patients in all three cohorts predicted as non-pCR exhibited poorer prognosis (P < 0.05, log-rank test). Furthermore, RNA sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence analyses revealed that high ICR-COME scores were associated with increased immune cell infiltration and enhanced activation of immune-related pathways.
conclusionsICR-COME, which integrates the ITH index, the radiomics score, and clinicopathologic variables, demonstrated strong predictive performance for pCR to NAC and prognosis in BC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41699278What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.