ReviewNature protocols2026
Drosophila melanogaster as a model host for studying Pseudomonas aeruginosa feeding infection.
Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protocol for quantifying aberrant features of adult Drosophila midgut stem cells as tumor-prediction biomarkers.STAR protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drosophila is an important model organism for studying epithelial barrier pathogenesis by Pseudomonas aeruginosa because it allows clinically important infectivity to be mimicked. Here, we present a Protocol Extension to introduce P. aeruginosa and other bacteria into the adult Drosophila intestine by feeding, further to our previously published protocol that used the needle-pricking method to impose a wound infection and the injector-pumping method of bacterial delivery directly into the fly hemocoel. We start with Drosophila preparation and priming for feeding, in parallel with bacterial growth and infection mix preparation. We continue with the feeding setup followed by the output measurements, which include, but are not limited to, fly survival, bacterial load and systemic spread, intestinal regeneration and gene expression. The protocol can be used to infect Drosophila with tens of different clinically important and insect-related bacterial species, one at a time or in combination; modify the inoculum consistency to control and even eliminate P. aeruginosa virulence; measure bacterial load in the hemolymph; assess intestinal histopathology of tumor-prone flies; and assess the host transcriptome. Preparation of adult flies for feeding lasts ≤1 week, and infection mixes can be prepared in 2 d, which require a minimum level of expertise in fly handling and microbiological techniques, respectively. All output measurements usually take ≤10 d or until all flies die from a virulent infection. Fly survival and bacterial load assessment require a short training, while intestinal histopathology and host gene expression assessment need up to a month of systematic training. Assessing bacterial load and gut measurements require 2 d of work per infection time point considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41699268What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.