Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699250›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Factors associated with occult ipsilateral and contralateral nodal metastasis in resectable lateralized laryngeal and hypopharyngeal malignancies.

Karthika Chettuvatti, Rajeev Kumar, Bashid Valia Valappil, Prem Sagar, Maroof Ahmad Khan, Rachit Sood, Nirmalya Samanta, Alok Thakar, Smriti Panda, Anup Singh and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Karthika ChettuvattiDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0655-277X
Rajeev KumarDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. rajeev9843@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2837-0428
Bashid Valia ValappilDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3003-583X
Prem SagarDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5590-9279
Maroof Ahmad KhanDepartment, Department of Bio-Statistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9449-6518
Rachit SoodDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4644-1296
Nirmalya SamantaDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5536-1493
Alok ThakarDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5691-8932
Smriti PandaDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1257-8611
Anup SinghDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9893-7106
Kapil SikkaDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3457-4518
Chirom Amit SinghDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6481-8093
Manish VermaDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Manaswita RoyDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1786-7164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe incidence of occult lymph node metastasis is high in cT4aN0 laryngeal and lateral hypopharyngeal cancers, and bilateral selective neck dissection (levels II–IV) is routinely performed for oncologic clearance. However, the risk, distribution, and determinants of occult contralateral nodal involvement remain incompletely characterised. This retrospective cohort study evaluates the incidence of occult lymph node metastasis, the nodal stations commonly involved, and clinicopathological factors associated with contralateral occult nodal metastasis in patients with cT4aN0 laryngeal and lateral hypopharyngeal cancers.

methodsThe retrospective chart review spanned from January 2018 to December 2023, encompassing all patients who underwent total laryngectomy.150 patients with clinico-radiologically confirmed T4aN0 status and who underwent bilateral selective neck dissection (level II-IV) were included in analysis. A descriptive pathological study was performed to assess occult nodal distribution in resectable lateralised laryngeal and hypopharyngeal malignancies.

resultsThe incidence of occult lymph node metastasis was 28% (n = 42/150). The most commonly involved lymph node stations were level II (85.7%; N = 36/42) followed by level III (42.8%; N = 18/42) and level IV (9.5%; N = 4/42). pN1 disease was seen in 64.2% (n = 27/42) and multiple occult nodes (pN2) were seen in 35.8% cases. The incidence of contralateral occult lymph metastasis was found to be 11.9% (n = 5/42). The pyriform sinus (OR = 2.922, p = 0.014) and epiglottis involvement (OR = 3.615, p = 0.006) were significantly associated with higher nodal positivity odds, while subglottic extension showed increased odds without reaching statistical significance (OR = 2.174, p = 0.083). Subglottic extension was exploratively associated with the likelihood of contralateral nodal involvement (p = 0.004).

conclusionThe risk of occult lymph metastasis in clinico-radiologically cT4N0 laryngeal and lateralised hypo pharyngeal malignancies is high(28%) and statistically significant association is seen with epiglottic and pyriform sinus involvement. The association of contralateral occult lymph node metastasis with subglottic extension need further validation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Indexed as

Hypopharyngeal NeoplasmsLaryngeal NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLaryngectomyMaleMiddle AgedNeck DissectionNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesAdvanced laryngeal carcinomaBilateral neck dissectionHypopharyngeal carcinomaMetastatic lymph nodesPathological nodal positivity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.