Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699241›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Listening effort measurement by pupillometry under dual-task paradigms: the effect of auditory spectral resolution.

Fahrettin Deniz Senli, Aysegul Ozkan, Cengiz Acarturk, Betul Cicek Cinar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fahrettin Deniz SenliDepartment of Audiology, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Türkiye. fdenizsenli@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7422-7940
Aysegul OzkanDepartment of Psychology, Başkent University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-8585
Cengiz AcarturkCenter for Cognitive Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5443-6868
Betul Cicek CinarDepartment of Audiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6570-9876

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study evaluated the relationship between auditory spectral resolution and listening effort using cochlear implant simulations in 21 normal-hearing participants.

methodsIn a dual-task paradigm, participants repeated noise-vocoded sentences to 4, 6, 8, and 12 channels, as well as everyday normal speech, while performing a secondary rhyme-judgment task. Listening effort was measured via secondary-task reaction time and pupil dilation.

resultsDecreased spectral resolution increased both reaction time and pupil size, indicating greater effort. Reaction time increased significantly only in the most degraded conditions (4 and 6 channels), whereas pupil dilation increased across all degraded conditions compared to intact speech. Speech intelligibility, although affected by degradation, did not predict either of the effort measures. The weak correlation between reaction time and pupil size suggests they capture related but distinct aspects of listening effort.

conclusionThese findings highlight the multidimensional nature of listening effort, demonstrating that physiological measures can reveal increased cognitive load even when behavioral performance is unaffected. Combining these measures is crucial for a comprehensive assessment of the cognitive consequences of perceiving degraded speech.

Indexed as

PupilSpeech PerceptionAdultCochlear ImplantsDual-Task TestsFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeSpeech IntelligibilityYoung AdultCochlear implantDual-taskListening effortPupillometryReaction time

Identifiers

PMID41699241
PMCPMC13152921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.