Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699238›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Optical biopsy of nasal cavity cancer with confocal laser endomicroscopy - a pilot study.

Flurin Müller-Diesing, Matti Sievert, Bharat Akhanda Panuganti, Marc Aubreville, Nils Porsche, Stephan Hackenberg, Manuel Stöth, Agmal Scherzad, Markus Wirth, Philipp Winnand and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Flurin Müller-DiesingDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Wurzburg University Hospital, Wurzburg, Germany. flurin.mueller-diesing@rwth-aachen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3069-1557
Matti SievertDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
Bharat Akhanda PanugantiDepartment of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Marc AubrevilleFlensburg University of Applied Sciences, Flensburg, Germany.
Nils PorscheFlensburg University of Applied Sciences, Flensburg, Germany.
Stephan HackenbergDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Wurzburg University Hospital, Wurzburg, Germany.
Manuel StöthDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Wurzburg University Hospital, Wurzburg, Germany.
Agmal ScherzadDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Wurzburg University Hospital, Wurzburg, Germany.
Markus WirthDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Philipp WinnandDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Miguel GoncalvesDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Wurzburg University Hospital, Wurzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNasal cavity carcinoma (NCC) arises in an anatomically and aesthetically critical region. Complete resection with negative margins is mandatory, yet even minimal additional tissue removal may cause substantial cosmetic and functional morbidity and increase the need for reconstruction. This underscores the need for an intraoperative optical biopsy. We report the first evaluation of confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) as a potential tool for optical biopsy in NCC.

methodsIn this pilot feasibility study including six patients, a blinded evaluation of 68 CLE video sequences (34 normal mucosa, 34 tumor), containing 4500 images, was performed independently by three investigators. A previously established scoring system from CLE studies in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma was applied to determine NCC-specific cut-off values and to assess concordance with investigator-based evaluations.

resultsCompared with normal mucosa, tumor sequences exhibited greater structural heterogeneity, atypical vascular patterns, increased variation in cell size, and indistinct cell borders. Investigators achieved an average sensitivity of 86.27% ± 9.1 and specificity of 94.13% ± 6.36. The comparison between all expert-based evaluations and all score-based results demonstrated an overall substantial agreement (Fleiss’ kappa: 0.75).

conclusionCLE appears feasible as an intraoperative optical biopsy in nasal cavity carcinoma. Prospective clinical studies should test clinical utility such as rates of complete resection, defect size, margin sampling efficiency.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellNasal CavityNose NeoplasmsAgedBiopsyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSensitivity and SpecificityConfocal laser endomicroscopyNasal cavity carcinomaOptical biopsy

Identifiers

PMID41699238
PMCPMC13002759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.