Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699205›Full record

SynthesisWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science

Theoretical Perspectives on the Minimal and Narrative Self in the Schizophrenia Spectrum: An Integrative Review.

Florestan Delcourt, Henry R Cowan, Jordan Sibéoni, Mélissa C Allé, Andreas C R Rasmussen, Rosa Ritunnano, Anne Giersch, Fabian Lo Monte, Jérôme Englebert, Bernard Pachoud

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Florestan DelcourtCentre de Recherches Psychanalyse, Médecine et Société (CRPMS), École Doctorale Recherches en Psychanalyse et Psychopathologie (ED450), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0465-5659
Henry R CowanDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Jordan SibéoniService Universitaire Intervention Précoce en Psychiatrie : Soins - Entourage - Adolescents (IP2SEA), Centre Hospitalier Argenteuil, Argenteuil, France.
Mélissa C AlléCNRS, UMR 9193, Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives (SCALab), Université de Lille, Lille, France.
Andreas C R RasmussenMental Health Center Amager, University of Copenhahen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rosa RitunnanoInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Anne GierschINSERM U1329 Strasbourg Translational Neuroscience and Psychiatry (STEP) Team Psychiatry, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbroug, France.
Fabian Lo MonteCentre de Recherches Psychanalyse, Médecine et Société (CRPMS), École Doctorale Recherches en Psychanalyse et Psychopathologie (ED450), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Jérôme EnglebertUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Bernard PachoudCentre de Recherches Psychanalyse, Médecine et Société (CRPMS), École Doctorale Recherches en Psychanalyse et Psychopathologie (ED450), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The self and its disorders in schizophrenia have been studied extensively over recent decades. Much of this literature is grounded in a bipartite understanding of the self, distinguishing the pre-reflective, minimal self from the reflective, narrative self. However, few studies have systematically examined the links between disturbances at these two levels of self. This integrative review addresses this gap by analyzing both theoretical and empirical contributions. Three theoretical models are described. The Structural model posits that minimal self-disorders hierarchically give rise to narrative self-disturbances and the schizophrenia phenotype, with a primarily pathogenic focus. The Dialectical model emphasizes reciprocal interactions between minimal and narrative self-disturbances, generating the schizophrenia phenotype with both pathogenic and salutogenic implications. The Contextual model highlights social, territorial, and biological dimensions of the self and its disorders in context. Empirical studies specifically addressing the mechanistic links between minimal and narrative self-disturbances remain scarce and preliminary. Overall, the literature appears preliminary and occasionally speculative, yet it suggests several promising avenues for future research and clinically relevant applications. This article is categorized under: Philosophy > Consciousness Psychology > Theory and Methods.

Indexed as

NarrationSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologySelf ConceptHumansModels, Psychologicalmeaning‐makingnarrativityphenomenologypsychosissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41699205
PMCPMC12909293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.