ArticleScientific reports2026
Predicting camouflage treatment outcomes in skeletal class III malocclusion using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter to editor regarding "Influence of general orthodontic treatment need and of specific anterior malocclusions on oral health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with class II malocclusion".Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study focused on developing a machine learning (ML) model to forecast the success of camouflage orthodontic treatment in individuals with skeletal Class III malocclusion and to identify significant predictors to aid treatment planning. A total of 100 adult patients who had skeletal Class III malocclusion and were treated with camouflage orthodontics were analyzed retrospectively. Treatment success was defined by an overjet exceeding 2 mm, proper canine relationship, and appropriate molar relationship (as applicable). Four machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, CART, Neural Network, and XGBoost) were trained and evaluated using fivefold cross-validation. Cephalometric variables were analyzed before and after treatment, and model performance was evaluated. Among all metrics, XGBoost exhibited the best predictive performance, suggesting better generalization. A decision tree model showed that the sagittal position of the lower incisors (L1_x) and palatal length (Palatal L) were the most influential predictors. An L1_x of less than 76 mm and a Palatal L of 41 mm or greater were strongly associated with successful treatment. ML algorithms, particularly XGBoost, can forecast the effectiveness of camouflage treatment for skeletal Class III malocclusion. Key predictors can guide treatment planning and support artificial intelligence-assisted orthodontic decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.