Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699160›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

The efficacy of integrating assistive technology and the CAPE lesson planning framework toward improving students' speaking skills.

Chinaza Solomon Ironsi, Hanife Bensen Bostanci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chinaza Solomon IronsiSchool of Research, Université Africaine de Développement Coopératif, Niamey, Niger. Solomon.chinaza@akun.edu.tr.
Hanife Bensen BostanciDepartment of English Language Teaching, Near East University, North Cyprus, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To examine whether integrating Apple's Siri with the CAPE lesson framework improves EFL speaking outcomes versus PPP. Method, a mixed-methods research design was used to provide evidence for the efficacy of this framework. Pre/Posttest and interview guides were used to collect data from 128 students assigned to control and experimental groups. After collecting data, the study found that the group using CAPE and Siri outperformed PPP and Siri on speaking scores. On the other hand, the interviewees highlighted motivation, pronunciation practice, and autonomous, low-anxiety speaking opportunities. Results obtained from this study were used to make the conclusion that pairing IPAs with a responsive framework (CAPE) is associated with improved speaking outcomes and positive learner experiences.

Indexed as

Self-Help DevicesSpeechStudentsFemaleHumansLearningMaleApple Siriartificial intelligenceassistive technologyCAPE frameworkinformal learning

Identifiers

PMID41699160
PMCPMC13000273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.