ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Can we predict postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion based on lateral x-ray? An external validation of two outcome scores.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative dysphagia following Anterior cervical discectomy and fixation (ACDF) impacts quality of life and risks airway complications. Identification of retropharyngeal oedema with a lateral Xray has gained interest as screening method. We prospectively evaluated the relation between dysphagia and two radiological scores to determine the external predictive value. A prospective study (2021-2022) held in a tertiary centre, including a sequential sample of patients operated of ACDF for degenerative conditions. Postoperative (day + 1) evaluation of dysphagia was systematically performed by a speech and language therapist. The retropharyngeal swelling index (by Haws) and the dysphagia predicting score (by Yoshida) were calculated on lateral Xray. A logistic regression model and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. 100 patients were included for analysis, of which 26% developed postoperative dysphagia (mild in 20% and mild-to-moderate in 6%). The most frequent form of dysphagia was oesophageal (18%), followed by oropharyngeal (4%) and pharyngoesophageal (3%). None of the potential risk factors studied were confirmed in our sample. For predicting oropharyngeal dysphagia, Yoshida score yielded an AUROC of 0.730 and the sweeling index an AUROC of 0.530. Conversely, in cases of oesophageal dysphagia, the AUROC were 0.590 and 0.504 respectively. From our data, it may be inferred that oropharyngeal and oesophageal dysphagia might harbour different underlying mechanisms, still not well understood. The use of a simple X-ray may become a routine screening step for patients undergoing ACDF. While it seems robust to predict oropharyngeal dysphagia, identification of oesophageal dysphagia may require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.