Trial reportScientific reports2026
Probiotic intervention not beneficial to prevent antibiotic-associated diarrhea in absence of antibiotic-induced microbiome disruption.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the knowledge, attitude, and practice of Egyptian pharmacists on probiotics: a cross-sectional study.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. One of the most common uses of probiotics is for prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD). Here we report on the PLAY-ON study (Probiotics: Live and Active Yogurt Cultures for Healthy Children ON Antibiotics) which was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study in healthy children who were prescribed antibiotics for acute outpatient upper respiratory illnesses, such as bacterial sinusitis or streptococcal pharyngitis. The treating clinician determined the antibiotic, its dosage and duration. Participants received either a control yogurt or a yogurt containing the probiotic, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactisBB-12. Our primary aim was to determine whether the probiotic prevented AAD. The microbiome of participants was examined longitudinally. Diarrhea rates were nearly identical at 2% (3 cases in the active group, 2 cases in the control group); adverse events were also similar between groups. Thus, our study did not find any differences in the incidence of AAD between those who took the probiotic and the control group. The microbiota of both groups returned to baseline by day 14 and assessment of the microbiome showed no difference in levels or types of antibiotic resistance genes. Broad-spectrum antibiotics are associated with higher rates of adverse events, including AAD, than narrow-spectrum antibiotics, as observed in children taking antibiotics for respiratory tract infections3,4.However, if the antibiotic does not significantly disturb the microbiota there may be no discernable role for the probiotic. This hypothesis is supported by the participants who used broad spectrum penicillins had a significantly higher rate of diarrhea compared to narrow spectrum antibiotic users, 9.1% and 0.51% respectively, (p=0.004)This study suggests that prescribing short-course, narrow spectrum antibiotics can reduce microbiome disruptions, concomitant AAD, and the need for probiotic intervention. . The antibiotics used in our study did not disrupt the microbiome to the extent expected, which likely accounted for the low observed incidence of AAD. Importantly, this observation can inform clinicians’ choice of antibiotic, steering them toward equally therapeutic antibiotics that are less disruptive to the microbiota and better tolerated. Although probiotics are often recommended to prevent AAD, our study demonstrates that in the absence of microbiome disruption, they may not provide benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.