ArticleScientific reports2026
SFD-YOLO for small-object fragment impact detection in warhead target-plate testing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address missed detections and limited efficiency in small fragment-impact recognition on target plates during warhead testing, this paper proposes small fragment detection YOLO (SFD-YOLO), a task-oriented detection framework built upon YOLOv11. An improved Spatial–Channel Reconstruction C3k2 (SCC3k2) module is integrated into the backbone to suppress redundant responses in both spatial and channel dimensions, enhancing the representation of weak micro-scale impact cues. To improve sensitivity to extremely small targets, we introduce an additional micro-object detection head and adopt an Asymptotic Feature Pyramid Network (AFPN) for progressive multi-level feature alignment and fusion, which strengthens feature consistency across pyramid levels. In addition, a Lightweight Adaptive Extraction (LAE) module is employed to replace standard convolutions, reducing model complexity while maintaining effective feature extraction. To comprehensively evaluate performance in realistic testing scenarios, we construct a multi-scene target-plate dataset from a series of static explosion experiments, covering both penetrative fragment holes and non-penetrative impact marks. Experimental results demonstrate that SFD-YOLO achieves 98.1% mAP@0.5 and 69.7% mAP@0.5:0.95, outperforming the YOLOv11 baseline by 2.7% in mAP@0.5 and 6.8% in mAP@0.5:0.95, at 135 FPS with only 2.15M parameters. Moreover, robustness evaluations under image degradations indicate that SFD-YOLO maintains more stable detection performance than the baseline. The proposed method provides a high-precision real-time solution for fragment lethality evaluation and shows potential for broader applications such as metal surface defect inspection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.