ArticleScientific reports2026
Association of early vedolizumab trough levels with clinical, biochemical, endoscopic response and drug optimization during maintenance therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The exposure-response relationship between vedolizumab (VDZ) trough levels (VTLs) and efficacy outcomes has been extensively studied, but data on early VTLs in Asian populations are limited. We assessed clinical outcomes and biochemical response using fecal calprotectin (BioRES[FC]) or C-reactive protein (BioRES[CRP]) at week 14 (W14) and W54, endoscopic healing (EH) at available follow-up time points, and the need for drug optimization during maintenance therapy among 67 patients treated with VDZ (39 Crohn’s disease [CD], and 28 ulcerative colitis [UC]). Associations between early VTLs and outcomes were assessed, with VTL cut-offs proposed using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). CD patients achieving W14 BioRES[CRP] had higher VTLs at W6 and W14. W54 BioRES[FC] responders and those not requiring drug optimization had higher W14 VTLs (11.2 vs. 3.8 µg/mL, P = 0.036; 2.2 vs. 5.8 µg/mL, P = 0.004). Proposed W14 VTL cut-offs were 5.3 µg/mL (AUC 0.859) for BioRES[FC] and 4.6 µg/mL (AUC 0.765) for drug optimization. In UC patients, higher early VTLs were noted in those achieving W14 corticosteroid-free clinical remission, W14 BioRES[FC], and W14 EH, but not consistently linked to W54 results. This real-life study suggests higher early VTLs correlated with better outcomes, with W14 VTLs potentially predicting long-term outcomes in CD patients. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and guide VDZ therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.