ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026
The evolution of the posterior approach in hip surgery: Back to Langenbeck.
Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe posterior approach is a proven approach in hip surgery. Over the past 150 years, we have seen many variations of posterior approaches arising from predecessors, with Dr. Bernhard von Langenbeck (1810–1887) as the founder of the modern posterior approach. The aim of this historical review is to understand the evolution of the posterior approach from its ‘birth’ with von Langenbeck to modern approaches in hip surgery.
methodsWe analysed von Langenbeck’s original manuscript, as well as literature of subsequent approaches.
resultsOver the past two centuries, surgical approaches to the hip joint have adapted to the changing needs and goals of surgeons and patients. Von Langenbeck developed a minimal invasive posterior approach in 1868 for femoral head resection of injured soldiers. According to subsequent surgeons, the perioperative view on the hip joint and surrounding structures was too minimal to reduce the number of complications, implement the first prostheses and fix fractures. As a result, surgical approaches became more invasive. Around 1900, Kocher and Moore further developed von Langenbeck’s approach more distally into the iliotibial band. After World War II, the Judet brothers extended their incision proximally to the pelvis to fix acetabular fractures. With the changing western society in the early 2000s, the demand for minimally invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty grew. Superior approaches were developed and show many similarities to von Langenbeck’s approach 150 years earlier.
conclusionWith the advent of minimally invasive superior approaches, the evolution of posterior approaches in hip surgery is Back to Langenbeck!
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.