ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Toward Better Conversations: Assessing Caregiver-Child Communication in Pediatric Oncology.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEffective parent-child communication is central to coping with psychosocial challenges of pediatric cancer, yet few studies have examined how caregivers and children perceive their communication. This study investigated differences between caregiver and child reports of communication and associations with family relationship quality. We hypothesized children would report more open and positive communication than caregivers report, reflecting directional discrepancies in communication quality.
methodsSeventy-six caregiver-child dyads (N = 152) were recruited from two Midwestern pediatric hospitals. Children aged 8-17 with cancer and their caregivers independently completed measures of parent-child communication (PCCS) and family relationships (PROMIS). Descriptive statistics, correlations, and paired- and independent-samples t-tests examined differences and associations across dyads. Exploratory Actor-Partner Interdependence Models (APIM) investigated dyadic associations between child and caregiver communication and child family relationships.
resultsCaregivers (10-item: M = 3.90, SD = 0.55; 20-item: M = 3.94, SD = 0.58) and children (M = 4.15, SD = 0.61) reported generally high-quality communication. However, significant differences emerged: children rated caregivers as more attentive listeners (t(74) = 2.53, p = .01, Cohen's d = 0.29), emotionally open (t(74) = 2.30, p = .02, Cohen's d = 0.27), and willing to discuss problems (t(74) = 2.86, p = .005, Cohen's d = 0.33) than caregivers reported children. Across correlation and APIM analyses, child-reported communication was strongly associated with child-reported family relationships and caregiver-reported communication was strongly associated with caregiver-reported child family relationships (actor effects). Older caregiver and child age was linked to lower communication scores.
conclusionsInterdependent caregiver and child perceptions of communication represent an underrecognized factor influencing family functioning in pediatric cancer. Findings underscore the importance of routine communication assessment and highlight the need for developmentally tailored interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.