ArticleScientific reports2026
Adaptive multi mechanism integration in the crested porcupine optimizer for global optimization and engineering design problems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Multi-Strategy Enhanced Crested Porcupine Optimizer with Targeted Defense Mechanism Improvement for Global Optimization.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Crested Porcupine Optimizer (CPO), an emerging intelligent optimization algorithm, exhibits considerable potential for addressing complex engineering problems, yet its capabilities remain insufficiently investigated. Nevertheless, the original CPO is susceptible to premature convergence and suffers from insufficient population diversity. To effectively address these limitations, this paper proposes a multi-mechanism enhanced Crested Porcupine Optimizer (SDHCPO). Its core innovation lies in the integration of four key strategies: a Sobol-Opposition-Based Learning (Sobol-OBL) initialization strategy, which combines the Sobol sequence with opposition-based learning to generate an initial population that is more uniformly distributed in the high-dimensional search space; a cosine-annealing-based dynamic adjustment strategy that replaces the original random weights and substantially enhances convergence stability; the incorporation of the DE/rand/1 strategy in the first defense phase to disrupt positional dependence and prevent premature convergence; and a horizontal-vertical crossover strategy employed in the second defense phase to eliminate dimensional stagnation. Experimental results on two authoritative benchmark suites, CEC2017 and CEC2022, demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms seven representative metaheuristic algorithms in terms of global exploration capability, local exploitation accuracy, and convergence robustness. Furthermore, empirical studies on five representative engineering design optimization problems show that SDHCPO consistently attains either the best-known solutions or highly competitive results reported in the literature, thereby further confirming its effectiveness and broad application potential for complex real-world engineering optimization tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.