ArticleScientific reports2026
Practical in-syringe mixing method for uniform particle delivery during embolization procedures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Embolic particles settle out of suspension inside syringes over time, leading to nonuniform particle delivery. A stepper motor stator was placed around a syringe containing a magnetic agitator to provide easily programmable rotating magnetic fields that result in the stirring of suspensions within the syringe. Injection uniformity was evaluated using a microscope, which recorded particle flow resulting from injections with and without mixing. Increasing delay times between initial uniform suspension and injection allowed particles to settle, which caused up to sixfold reductions in injection uniformity across all injection rates (1, 5, 10 mL/min), with particle boluses often ejected near the end of an injection. In-syringe mixing provided a fourfold improvement in injection uniformity at all injection flow rates following long delay times (120 s); at slow injection rates (1 mL/min), mixing provided better uniformity than all injections performed without mixing. Mixing performance was optimized by using moderate agitator rotation rates (~ 10 revolutions per second) and frequent changes in rotation direction (~ every 250 ms). This compact solution for maintaining and injecting uniform embolic suspensions prevents particle settling, reduces variability during injections, and has applications in both clinical and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.