Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699067›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Support vector machine algorithm-based wearable device in sports rehabilitation training for people with disabilities.

Qinqin Xiong, Longjin Gui, Chuan Shu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qinqin XiongSchool of Physical Education and Health, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang, 330013, China. turnsole324@163.com.
Longjin GuiSchool of Physical Education and Health, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang, 330013, China.
Chuan ShuSchool of Physical Education and Health, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang, 330013, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim was to investigate the application effect of wearable devices based on the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm in sports rehabilitation training for people with disabilities. A total of 159 people with disabilities from Nanchang were assigned to either a control group (routine training, n = 82) or an observation group (routine training plus SVM algorithm-based wearable device, n = 77). WHODAS, WHOQOL-BREF, and activities of daily living (ADL) scales were employed to assess the functional status and quality of life (QoL) changes before and after intervention, and the training compliance and satisfaction were compared. The following parameters were compared, including the range of motion (ROM), gait, and trunk parameters between the two groups, along with the classification performance of three algorithms-standard support vector machine (SVM), particle swarm optimization SVM (PSO-SVM), and artificial bee colony optimization SVM (ABC-SVM)-in motion pattern recognition. No statistical distinctions in WHODAS, WHOQOL-BREF, and ADL scores were noted at baseline (P > 0.05). A substantial improvement was noted in all indicators post-intervention (P < 0.05). The observation group had greater score reductions in the cognition, mobility, self-care, and social participation dimensions of WHODAS, a more obvious increase in scores in the physical, psychological, independence, and environment dimensions of WHOQOL-BREF, and a larger increase in ADL scores (P < 0.05). Before the intervention, there were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) between the two groups in hip joint ROM, knee joint ROM, step length, stride width, or walking speed. After the intervention, both groups showed significant increases in hip and knee joint ROM (P < 0.05), with the observation group demonstrating a more pronounced increase (P < 0.05). Step length, stride width, and walking speed also showed significant improvement (P < 0.05), with the observation group showing greater improvement (P < 0.05). Before the intervention, there were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) between the two groups in C7 lateral deviation, trunk tilt angle, shoulder tilt angle, pelvic tilt angle, thoracic kyphosis angle, or lumbar lordosis angle. After the intervention, all these parameters showed significant improvement in both groups (P < 0.05), with the observation group showing more marked improvement (P < 0.05). Training compliance and satisfaction in the observation group were significantly higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). The ABC-SVM algorithm demonstrated the best classification performance, significantly outperforming both PSO-SVM and standard SVM (P < 0.05). Wearable devices based on the SVM algorithm can more effectively improve the functional status, QoL, and ADL of people with disabilities. The SVM model combined with intelligent optimization algorithms can improve the accuracy of motion recognition and enhance the intelligence level of the rehabilitation system.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesSportsSupport Vector MachineWearable Electronic DevicesActivities of Daily LivingAdultAlgorithmsFemaleGaitHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRange of Motion, ArticularYoung AdultComplianceIntelligent algorithmsPeople with disabilitiesQuality of lifeRehabilitation trainingSupport vector machineWearable devices

Identifiers

PMID41699067
PMCPMC13000263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.