ArticleScientific reports2026
Participatory development and proof-of-concept of an intersectionality-informed art-based group intervention for BIPoC girls.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While racism and its negative mental health impact are widespread problems for BIPoC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color) girls in Germany, intersectionality-informed psychological interventions remain unavailable. To address this gap, this study piloted an youth-informed art-based group intervention designed to strengthen girls’ internal resources (e.g., self-worth, self-efficacy) and reduce mental health symptoms. Conducted in three phases, it involved: (1) a focus group with BIPoC girls (n = 8) to explore needs and preferences; (2) pilot testing of a self-reflective weekly journal to assess its feasibility; and (3) a six-week art-based group intervention with BIPoC girls (n = 7, aged 14–16) to evaluate feasibility and acceptability using a mixed method approach. Feasibility was supported by high attendance (71% attended ≥ 4 sessions) and positive session ratings (92.9% very good/good); acceptability was reflected in high satisfaction, perceived emotional safety, cultural resonance, and valuing of creative activities, with 75% reporting improved well-being after sessions. Preliminary outcomes showed small descriptive increases in self-efficacy and self-worth, and post-session gains in self-satisfaction. The journal was viewed as a potentially useful self-regulatory tool but had low uptake. These findings provide valuable directions for shaping intersectionality-informed, creative group interventions for BIPoC girls in Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.