Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699020›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Reference percentiles for children and adolescents for the digital motor performance test (DigiMot): results from the COMO-study.

Thorsten Klein, Annette Worth, Claudia Niessner, Samuel Merk, Anke Hanssen-Doose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thorsten KleinInstitute of Movement and Sport, Karlsruhe University of Education, Bismarckstraße 10, 76133, Karlsruhe, Germany. thorsten.klein@ph-karlsruhe.de.
Annette WorthInstitute of Movement and Sport, Karlsruhe University of Education, Bismarckstraße 10, 76133, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Claudia NiessnerInstitute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstraße 12, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Samuel MerkDepartment of Empirical Educational Research, Karlsruhe University of Education, Bismarckstraße 10, 76133, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Anke Hanssen-DooseInstitute of Movement and Sport, Karlsruhe University of Education, Bismarckstraße 10, 76133, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responding to the growing demand for scalable assessment tools, this study provides the first age- and sex-specific reference percentiles for remotely assessed physical fitness tests in German children and adolescents aged 7-15 years. Data from 1149 participants (554 male; 595 female) of the COMO-study were used to assess coordination, muscular endurance, and flexibility via videoconference with the DigiMot test profile. Percentile curves were generated using generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape. Results revealed typical developmental trajectories, with performance increasing with age and differing by sex and fitness component. An exception was the decline in girls’ Push-up performance with age. Boys outperformed girls in Push-ups and Sit-ups from early age, while girls initially surpassed boys in coordination until early adolescence. Girls (mean: 77.5%) achieved better results in the Stand-and-Reach across all age groups than boys (mean: 48.1%). Performance variability was generally higher in boys across all tests. These findings provide a foundation for age- and sex-specific reference values for remotely assessed physical fitness. By enabling standardized interpretation of remote test results, the percentiles support broader applications of remote fitness diagnostics in research and practice despite some limitations in sample representativeness and percentile stability in older age groups.

Indexed as

Exercise TestPhysical FitnessAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleReference Values

Identifiers

PMID41699020
PMCPMC12913944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.