ArticleScientific reports2026
Reference percentiles for children and adolescents for the digital motor performance test (DigiMot): results from the COMO-study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Responding to the growing demand for scalable assessment tools, this study provides the first age- and sex-specific reference percentiles for remotely assessed physical fitness tests in German children and adolescents aged 7-15 years. Data from 1149 participants (554 male; 595 female) of the COMO-study were used to assess coordination, muscular endurance, and flexibility via videoconference with the DigiMot test profile. Percentile curves were generated using generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape. Results revealed typical developmental trajectories, with performance increasing with age and differing by sex and fitness component. An exception was the decline in girls’ Push-up performance with age. Boys outperformed girls in Push-ups and Sit-ups from early age, while girls initially surpassed boys in coordination until early adolescence. Girls (mean: 77.5%) achieved better results in the Stand-and-Reach across all age groups than boys (mean: 48.1%). Performance variability was generally higher in boys across all tests. These findings provide a foundation for age- and sex-specific reference values for remotely assessed physical fitness. By enabling standardized interpretation of remote test results, the percentiles support broader applications of remote fitness diagnostics in research and practice despite some limitations in sample representativeness and percentile stability in older age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.