ArticleScientific reports2026
Dyadic family hardiness and coping styles on fear of cancer recurrence in adolescent malignant bone tumor patients and caregivers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current status of the fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) was investigated among adolescents with malignant bone tumors and their caregivers, and the actor‒partner interdependence model was applied to explore the influence of family resilience and the coping styles of adolescents with malignant bone tumors and their caregivers on their own FCR as well as that of each other. This study used a cross-sectional design and 269 adolescents with malignant bone tumors paired with their caregivers were selected from two hospitals in Zhejiang Province. These samples were surveyed using the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form, the Family Hardiness Index, and a simple coping style questionnaire. A total of 560 questionnaires were distributed, and 538 valid questionnaires were collected, including those from 269 patients and 269 caregivers, for a recovery rate of 96.07%. The model fit for positive response, family resilience, and negative coping with the FCR by these patients and their caregivers was good. In the actor model, patients' positive coping and family resilience negatively predicts their own FCR, while patients' negative coping positively predicts their own FCR, and caregivers' family resilience negatively predicts their own FCR. In the partner model, patient' and caregivers' positive coping negatively predicts each other's FCR, while patients' and caregivers' negative coping positively predicts each other's FCR, and caregivers' family resilience negatively predicts each other's FCR. However, caregivers' coping styles have no actor effect on their own FCR, and caregivers' family resilience has no partner effects on patients' FCR. The FCR of adolescent patients with malignant bone tumors and their caregivers exerts an interactive effect on the coping styles and family resilience levels of both parties, suggesting that medical staff should treat patients and caregivers as a whole, give due consideration to the FCR assessments of adolescent malignant bone tumor patients and their caregivers, and actively explore intervention programs from a binary perspective to effectively reduce the FCR degree of both parties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.