ArticleScientific reports2026
Efficiency of floating treatment wetlands planted with Iris pseudacorus and Glyceria maxima.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global water shortages and declining water quality are critical challenges. Natural-based solutions (NBSs), such as floating treatment wetlands (FTWs), offer promising methods for water restoration and climate adaptation. This study evaluates the efficiency of FTWs planted with Iris pseudacorus and Glyceria maxima in improving water quality by removing nutrients and organic matter. Conducted in a controlled climate chamber, the experiments utilized treated wastewater in six tanks, with FTWs constructed from PE pipes, coconut mats, and hydroponic pots. The study spanned two sequential experiments, lasting 35 and 21 days, respectively. Results indicated that FTWs significantly enhanced pollutant removal compared to control tanks. Iris pseudacorus demonstrated higher removal rates for both phosphates and total nitrogen than Glyceria maxima. The presence of FTWs altered dissolved oxygen concentrations, pH, and oxidation-reduction potential, highlighting complex interactions between biological processes and physicochemical conditions. The study confirmed that FTWs can reduce hydraulic retention time for effective total nitrogen removal from 21 to 5 days. Algal growth, prominent in control tanks, was absent in FTW systems, likely due to nutrient competition and shading by macrophytes. The findings underscore the importance of plant species selection in FTW design and implementation. This study supports the potential of FTWs as a tertiary wastewater treatment method and a strategy for mitigating eutrophication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.