ArticleScientific reports2026
Development of an integrated computational-experimental framework for predicting grinding force and safety in ultrasonic bone scalpels operations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to develop a high-precision predictive model for grinding forces generated by ultrasonic bone scalpels during spinal surgery, to enhance safety by establishing quantitative operational boundaries. Existing predictive models often rely on simplified 2D simulations or theoretical decompositions, which may limit accuracy in capturing the complex three-dimensional kinematics and tool-bone interactions. To address this, an integrated framework combining three-dimensional explicit dynamic finite element analysis (FEA) with a Box-Behnken experimental design and response surface methodology was developed. The FEA model realistically simulates tool-bone interaction, while the RSM systematically investigates the coupling effects of bone density (480-800-1640 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.