Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41698987›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

External validation of the PREVENT risk score: performance and clinical utility in an Iranian population.

Amirhossein Hasanpour, Samaneh Asgari, Davood Khalili, Fereidoun Azizi, Farzad Hadaegh

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amirhossein Hasanpour *Prevention of Metabolic Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Metabolic and Obesity Disorders, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, No. 24, Yamen Street, Velenjak, 19395-4763, Tehran, Iran.
Samaneh Asgari *Prevention of Metabolic Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Metabolic and Obesity Disorders, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, No. 24, Yamen Street, Velenjak, 19395-4763, Tehran, Iran.
Davood KhaliliPrevention of Metabolic Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Metabolic and Obesity Disorders, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, No. 24, Yamen Street, Velenjak, 19395-4763, Tehran, Iran. ndavood@yahoo.com.
Fereidoun AziziEndocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Disorders, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farzad HadaeghPrevention of Metabolic Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Metabolic and Obesity Disorders, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, No. 24, Yamen Street, Velenjak, 19395-4763, Tehran, Iran. fzhadaegh@endocrine.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of cardiovascular disease risk is crucial for prevention, but current models may not be generalizable to diverse populations. This study externally validated the predicting risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs (PREVENT) model, which includes clinical and metabolic predictors, such as estimated glomerular filtration rate, to estimate 10-year ASCVD risk. Using data from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study, we assessed its performance in a Middle Eastern population of 5799 adults (ages 30–79 years) over a median of 13 years. We evaluated discrimination (AUC), calibration (pre- and post-recalibration), and decision-analytic metrics like net benefit (NB) and net reclassification improvement (NRI). The ASCVD incidence rate was 4.7 per 1000 person-years. PREVENT showed excellent discrimination in women (AUC: 0.84) and acceptable performance in men (AUC: 0.76). The model initially underestimated risk in men, which was corrected by recalibration, improving predicted risk from 4.2 to 7.6% and sensitivity from 62% to 80%. Recalibration also improved NRI (men: +61%, women: +79%) and slightly increased NB. Decision curve analysis showed clinical advantages for risk thresholds of 10–20% in women and 13–20% in men. PREVENT provides a promising tool for ASCVD risk prediction in Middle Eastern populations with local adaptation.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesAdultAgedFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsCardiovascular diseaseExternal validationPREVENTRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID41698987
PMCPMC12996296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.