ArticleScientific reports2026
Ventral lengthening is preferable to combined ventral lengthening and dorsal plication for penile length in hypospadias with severe ventral curvature.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to compare the effects of ventral lengthening (VL) versus ventral lengthening combined with dorsal plication (VL + DP) techniques on penile length in hypospadias. Clinical data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent hypospadias repairs with urethral plate transection between March 2017 and June 2023. Patients were divided into VL group and VL + DP group based on the curvature correction techniques. Two novel parameters—penile lengthening ratio (PLR) and curvature-adjusted penile lengthening ratio (CPLR)—were introduced to evaluate the effectiveness of penile lengthening. A total of 103 male patients with hypospadias and severe ventral curvature were included. In patients with a curvature degree after degloving (CDAD) greater than 45°, the CPLR was significantly higher in the VL group compared to that in the VL + DP group (0.0101 ± 0.0028 vs. 0.0085 ± 0.0024, p = 0.026). Among patients with proximal hypospadias, the CPLR in the VL group was significantly higher than that in the VL + DP group (0.0106 ± 0.0024 vs. 0.0093 ± 0.0026, p = 0.041). In patients with CDAD > 45° or proximal hypospadias, VL demonstrated superior penile elongation compared to VL + DP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.