ArticleScientific reports2026
Effects of pre-fracturing fluids on pore-fracture structure and mechanical properties of deep coal.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hydraulic fracturing is a key technology for enhancing coalbed methane recovery. Preconditioning the reservoir with acidizing or oxidative fluids can significantly improve stimulation outcomes; however, comparative studies evaluating these fluids in coal seams are still limited. In this work, deep coal samples (depth > 2500 m) were treated with five different pre-fracturing fluids—slick water (PAM), hydrochloric acid (HCl), hydrochloric and hydrofluoric (HCl + HF) acid, sodium hypochlorite (NaClO), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)—and their effects on porosity, permeability, and mechanical properties were systematically compared using low-field NMR, SEM, and mechanical testing. The potential relationships between changes in mechanical parameters and pore-fracture structure were also examined. Results show that all five fluids increased total porosity by 33.98 ~ 45.04%. The HCl + HF produced the most dramatic permeability enhancement (13,561.54%), whereas HCl alone reduced permeability by 78.01%. Moreover, HCl + HF led to the most pronounced reduction in both compressive and tensile strength. Kendall correlation analysis revealed several significant relationships: Young’s modulus (E) correlated negatively with total porosity (φt) and average roughness (Ra); Poisson’s ratio (ν) showed a positive correlation with φt; and tensile strength (Rt) was negatively correlated with Ra. These findings provide practical insights for selecting pre-fracturing fluids based on desired reservoir weakening or permeability enhancement objectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.