Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41698983›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

APOL1 plasma membrane pools resist rapid protein degradation.

Verena Höffken, Laura Alvermann, David Niggemeier, Katrin Beul, Pavel Nedvetsky, Bernhard Ellinger, Daria Assenmacher, Daniel Granado, Hermann Pavenstädt, Thomas Weide

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Verena HöffkenMedical Clinic D, University Hospital Münster, Albert Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A14, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Laura AlvermannMedical Clinic D, University Hospital Münster, Albert Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A14, 48149, Münster, Germany.
David NiggemeierMedical Clinic D, University Hospital Münster, Albert Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A14, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Katrin BeulMedical Clinic D, University Hospital Münster, Albert Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A14, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Pavel NedvetskyMedical Clinic D, University Hospital Münster, Albert Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A14, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Bernhard EllingerDepartment Screening Port, Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Schnackenburgallee 114, 22525, Hamburg, Germany.
Daria AssenmacherMedical Clinic D, University Hospital Münster, Albert Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A14, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Daniel GranadoMedical Clinic D, University Hospital Münster, Albert Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A14, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Hermann PavenstädtMedical Clinic D, University Hospital Münster, Albert Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A14, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Thomas WeideMedical Clinic D, University Hospital Münster, Albert Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A14, 48149, Münster, Germany. weidet@uni-muenster.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homozygosity of two sequence variants within the human APOL1 gene, called APOL1 G1 and G2, in combination with high Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) expression levels are linked to a wide spectrum of renal diseases summarized as APOL1-mediated kidney diseases (AMKDs). Previous studies have shown that inflammatory and immunomodulatory triggers are major contributors to elevated APOL1 protein expression. However, little is known about the stability of APOL1 and the role of protein degradation in regulating its intracellular levels. In this study, we systematically investigated these aspects. To investigate degradation dynamics, we used stable HEK293T cell lines with inducible overexpression of GFP-tagged APOL1 vA/G0, its C-terminal risk variants (G1, G2), N-terminal isoforms (vB1, vB3, vC), as well as the deletion mutant (ΔN59), APOL2, and an APOL1–APOL2 chimeric protein (NTvA-APOL2). Degradation and protein biosynthesis were modified using proteasome inhibitors and cycloheximide, respectively. Treated cells were analyzed using Western blotting, immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry analyses. Moreover, in silico analyses were performed to identify motifs within the APOL1 sequence potentially mediating its degradation. This study shows that APOL1 is subject to remarkably rapid proteasomal degradation, observed for both the APOL1 wildtype (G0) and renal risk variants (RRVs) G1 and G2. Moreover, despite distinct topologies at the intracellular membranes of the APOL1 isoforms, all exhibit rapid protein degradation. In contrast, APOL2 – the closest homolog of APOL1 – demonstrated significantly greater resistance to proteasomal degradation. In silico analyses identified two intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) present in APOL1 but absent in APOL2, potentially underlying the increased susceptibility to degradation. Notably, APOL1 surface-localized pools were resistant to rapid proteasomal degradation, with no major differences observed between G0 and RRVs. Together our findings suggest that APOL1 stability is highly compartment-specific, with rapid degradation at intracellular pools and pronounced stability at the cell surface. Targeting the stability of APOL1 at the PM represents a promising avenue for the development of novel therapeutic interventions against AMKD.

Indexed as

Apolipoprotein L1Cell MembraneProteolysisHEK293 CellsHumansProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein IsoformsProtein StabilityAPOL1 protein, humanApolipoprotein L1Proteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein IsoformsAMKDAPOL1APOL2DegradationIDRIntracellular poolsProtein stabilityRenal risk variantssurface-localized pools

Identifiers

PMID41698983
PMCPMC12913894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.