Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41698950›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

ChatBCI, a P300 speller BCI with context-driven word prediction leveraging large language models, from concept to evaluation.

Jiazhen Hong, Weinan Wang, Laleh Najafizadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiazhen HongIntegrated Systems and NeuroImaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Weinan WangIntegrated Systems and NeuroImaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Laleh NajafizadehIntegrated Systems and NeuroImaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA. laleh.najafizadeh@rutgers.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

P300 speller brain computer interfaces (BCIs) allow users to compose sentences by selecting target keys on a graphical user interface (GUI) through the detection of P300 component in their electroencephalogram (EEG) signals following visual stimuli. Most existing P300 speller BCIs require users to spell all or the first few initial letters of the intended word, letter by letter. Consequently, a large number of keystrokes could be required to write an intended sentence, thereby, increasing user's time and cognitive load. There is a need for more efficient and user-friendly methods for faster, and practical sentence composition. In this work, we introduce ChatBCI, a P300 speller BCI that leverages the zero-shot learning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to suggest words from user-spelled initial letters or predict the subsequent word(s), reducing keystrokes and accelerating sentence composition. ChatBCI retrieves word suggestions through remote queries to the GPT-3.5 API. A modified GUI, displaying GPT-3.5 word suggestions as extra keys is designed. Stepwise linear discriminant analysis (SWLDA) is used for the P300 classification. Seven subjects completed two online spelling tasks: 1) copy-spelling a self-composed sentence using ChatBCI, and 2) improvising a sentence using ChatBCI's word suggestions. Results demonstrate that for the copy-spelling task, on average, ChatBCI outperforms letter-by-letter BCI spellers, reducing time and keystrokes by [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively, and increasing information transfer rate by [Formula: see text]. For the improvised sessions, ChatBCI achieves [Formula: see text] keystroke savings across subjects. Overall, ChatBCI, by employing remote LLM queries outperforms traditional spellers without requiring local model training or storage. ChatBCI's (multi-)word prediction capability paves the way for developing next-generation speller BCIs that are efficient and effective for real-time communication, specially for users with communication and motor disabilities.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesEvent-Related Potentials, P300ElectroencephalographyHumansLarge Language ModelsAssistive TechnologiesBrain Computer Interfaces (BCIs)ChatGPTElectroencephalography (EEG)Keystroke SavingsLarge Language Models (LLMs)P300 SpellersWord Prediction

Identifiers

PMID41698950
PMCPMC12909297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.