Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41698904›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Environment, taxonomy, and socioeconomics predict non-imperilment in freshwater fishes.

Christina A Murphy, J Andres Olivos, Ivan Arismendi, Emili García-Berthou, Sherri L Johnson, Jason Dunham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christina A Murphy *U.S. Geological Survey, Maine Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Orono, Maine, USA. christina.murphy@maine.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3467-6610
J Andres Olivos *Department of Forest Engineering, Resources, and Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5868-4754
Ivan ArismendiDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8774-9350
Emili García-BerthouGRECO, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, University of Girona, Girona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8412-741X
Sherri L JohnsonPacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Jason DunhamU.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freshwater fishes are among the most threatened taxa, yet conservation assessments remain incomplete for many species. Freshwater fishes provide essential ecosystem services such as food security, recreational opportunities, and cultural significance. Despite heavy alterations to freshwater ecosystems, the reasons for species' sensitivity and resistance to imperilment are unclear. To address this need, we develop a machine learning framework to predict global imperilment status for 10,631 freshwater fish species using a comprehensive set of environmental, socioeconomic, and intrinsic species-level predictors. Using updated IUCN Red List data, we train and validate Random Forest classifiers to distinguish imperiled (Vulnerable, Endangered, Critically Endangered) from non-imperiled species. We examine the relative influence of 52 variables derived from 12 global sources describing extrinsic environmental and socioeconomic factors and intrinsic species-specific characteristics. Our models achieve higher accuracy for non-imperiled species (90.1%) compared to imperiled species (81.8%), reflecting the greater heterogeneity of threats and conditions driving imperilment. Across models, key predictors include habitat variables, taxonomic order, hydrological characteristics, and disturbance indicators, underscoring the interplay between ecology, geography, and human pressures. This integrative, reproducible approach demonstrates the utility of machine learning for guiding proactive conservation and provides a scalable framework for global biodiversity risk assessment.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesFishesFresh WaterAnimalsBiodiversityClassification AlgorithmsEcosystemEndangered SpeciesMachine LearningPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID41698904
PMCPMC12909873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.