ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2026
Ionic Liquid-Electrode Interface at Saturation: To Crowd, or Not to Crowd?
Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At electrified interfaces, ions from concentrated electrolytes are known to arrange into alternating layers near highly charged surfaces. Saturation of such layers leads to a power-law decay in capacitance-potential curves. Some researchers relate this power-law to the crowding of ions; however, in this letter, we demonstrate that it can also result from the phenomenon known as overscreening. To help researchers answer the "to crowd or not to crowd" question, by distinguishing between these two charging regimes and ionic layer saturation, we derive an asymptotic description and examine molecular dynamics simulations, in which overscreening consistently dominates, while crowding is observed only under unrealistically extreme conditions. This insight expands understanding of how saturation works in concentrated electrolytes. Moreover, recognizing which mechanism is at play─crowding or overscreening─allows more precise control of charging behavior in electrochemical devices, from actuators, batteries, and capacitors to desalination systems, electrolyzers, and fuel cells.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.