Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41698828›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026

Benchmarking Orbital-Free Density-Potential Functional Theory of Electrified Metal-Solution Interfaces.

Chenkun Li, Xiwei Wang, Michael Eikerling, Jun Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chenkun LiInstitute of Energy and Climate Research, IET-3: Theory and Computation of Energy Materials, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5574-0805
Xiwei WangInstitute of Energy and Climate Research, IET-3: Theory and Computation of Energy Materials, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-3554-3734
Michael EikerlingInstitute of Energy and Climate Research, IET-3: Theory and Computation of Energy Materials, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0764-8948
Jun HuangInstitute of Energy and Climate Research, IET-3: Theory and Computation of Energy Materials, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1668-5361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electrical double layer (EDL) at the metal-solution interface is a nanoscale region where quantum mechanical metal electrons meet almost classical electrolyte species. Describing metal electrons with orbital-free density-functional theory (DFT), the recently developed density-potential functional theoretical (DPFT) model constitutes a computationally efficient approach to modeling the EDL. However, the performance of orbital-free DFT is less studied for interfaces than for bulk phases. Herein, we develop a constant-potential Kohn-Sham-Poisson-Boltzmann theory with exact kinetic energy as a benchmark for DPFT models. Solving Kohn-Sham and Poisson-Boltzmann equations self-consistently, we obtain electron density, electrostatic potential, and double-layer capacitance of the EDL, which are then used to assess DPFT models with Thomas-Fermi-von Weizsäcker (TFvW) or Pauli-Gaussian kinetic energy functional. In general, TFvW outperforms the Pauli-Gaussian kinetic energy functional for modeling EDL. In addition, a much smaller gradient coefficient in the TFvW functional than the default value of 5/3 is suggested for modeling the EDL. These findings are instrumental to the future development of orbital-free DFT for electrochemical interfaces.

Identifiers

PMID41698828
PMCPMC12980745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.