ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM2026
How High-Performing Community Health Clinics Accomplish Social Risk Screening.
Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Point-of-Care Ultrasound, Prevention and Screening, Family Medicine Workforce, Navigating Systems, and Improving Patient Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRecent national policies encourage health care delivery systems to document patients' social risks (SR), for example, food, housing, and transportation insecurity, and provide referrals to community services. Under-resourced community health centers (CHCs) face challenges integrating SR screening into care delivery. We sought out CHCs with consistently higher-than-average SR screening rates to understand what drives sustained integration.
methodsThis qualitative study used semistructured interviews to collect data about strategies for implementing and sustaining SR screening, staff and patient experiences, and external influences. We recruited 5 CHCs in 3 states with SR screening rates in the top 20% of a large national CHC network. Clinic staff in a variety of roles were invited to participate. Thematic analysis was used for interpretation of interview transcripts.
resultsInterviews were conducted with 27 clinicians and other clinic staff. Responses highlighted both internal and external influences on SR screening. Internally, organization-wide investments in team-based care, longitudinal commitments to quality improvement activities, and capacity to coordinate social services were all cited as key drivers of staff commitment to screening. External influences included Accountable Care Organization incentives, Primary Care Medical Home certification requirements, and support from CHC consortia and external grants. Across interviews, SR screening was framed as a collective endeavor aligned with CHCs' collective mission to serve the whole patient.
conclusionCHCs with a sustained culture of team-based care, quality improvement, and care coordination may be more likely to integrate SR screening. Alongside enhanced external supports, investments in these well-characterized and mutually reinforcing building blocks of primary care are likely to translate to sustained SR screening in primary care clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.